Image for @Welcome to the Site of the Strasbourg Consortium
Welcome to the Site of the Strasbourg Consortium 
Facebook icon

This site is dedicated to reporting and commenting upon issues involving freedom of conscience, religion, or belief throughout the member states of the Council of Europe, with particular focus on the work of the European Court of Human Rights and its predecessor tribunal, the European Commission of Human Rights. We are working to make this site the definitive source of information for scholars and others interested in understanding and having some influence upon the work of the Court in this vital area. Since the decisions on the important issues pending before the Court will shape the basic contours of freedom of religion or belief for years to come, not only throughout Europe, but throughout the world as the Court and its opinions become increasingly influential, the kind of work envisioned by, and carried out by, the Strasbourg Consortium is particularly critical.  

We welcome you to our site, and encourage you to investigate its possibilities to determine how it may serve you, and how you might contribute to its success.

PLEASE NOTE: This site is independently operated by the staff of the International Center for Law and Religion Studies. It has no official affiliation with the Council of Europe or the European Court of Human Rights.

Image for Recent Decisions, Judgments, and Hearings

Bektashi Community and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (nos. 48044/10, 75722/12, 25176/13) - First Section Chamber Judgment. From the Court's press release: The applicants are the Bektashi Community, a religious association, and two of its members, Mr E. Brahimaj, an Albanian national, and Mr A. Sulejmani, a Macedonian national. They both live in ‘the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’ (FYROM) . . . . Mr E. Brahimaj holds the highest position in the hierarchy of the community. / The case concerned their complaint that, when new legislation entered into force in 2007, the domestic courts had refused to allow the association to retain its status as a religious organisation and to accept its fresh application for registration. / The applicant association operated as an officially recognised religious organisation from 1993. When new legislation on the legal status of churches, religious communities and groups entered into force in 2007, the association... more

Image for Recently Communicated Cases

Christian Religious Organization of Jehovah's Witnesses in the NKR v Armenia (no. 41817/10) Communicated 15 March 2018.  The applicants are the Christian Religious Organization of Jehovah's Witnesses NKR, a religious community established in the Republic of Nagorno Karabakh in 1993 ("the applicant community") and an Armenian national Mr. Sargis Avanesyan, who was born in 1962 and is the community elder living in Stepanakert ("the applicant").  In June 2009, the applicant community applied to the NKR Government for state registration.  In July 2009, the NKR government staff provided an expert opinion to determine if the applicant community fulfilled the requirements of Article 5 of the NKR law.  The expert opinion concluded that by their ideology, the applicant community is  "far from a Christian organization."  In August 2009, the State Registry Department rejected the application relying on the expert opinion.  In spring of 2010, the police raided the religious meetings of the applicant community and arrested five members who were charged with an administrative offense.  The applicants complain under Articles 9 and 11 of the Convention of the... more

Image for Before the Grand Chamber

Kàroly Nagy v. Hungary (no. 56665/09) - Grand Chamber Judgment 14 September 2017). Kàroly Nagy, a pastor in the Hungarian Calvinist Church, was dismissed following a disciplinary procedure in 2006. He initiated labor-law proceedings for unpaid renumeration against the church, but complained that his case was dismissed by state courts because they are ecclesiastical in nature. Mr Nagy then brought proceedings before both the labour and civil courts. Both sets of proceedings were ultimately discontinued on the ground that the courts had no jurisdiction. The labour courts discontinued the proceedings in December 2006, on the ground that the dispute concerned Mr Nagy’s service as a pastor and therefore the provisions of Labour Law were not applicable in his case. That decision was upheld on appeal in April 2007. Mr Nagy’s civil-law claim was also ultimately... more

 

Draft Copenhagen Declaration (full text) (The Danish Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe)

ECtHR: Opinion on the draft Copenhagen Declaration (European Court of Human Rights, Adopted by the Bureau in light of the discussion in the Plenary Court on 19 February 2018)

Joint NGO statement following the Danish Chairmanship’s High-Level Expert Conference (EHRAC with Amnesty International, International Commission of Jurists, European Implementation Network, SOS-Torture Network, European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC))

Undue political pressure is not dialogue: The draft Copenhagen Declaration and its potential repercussions on the Court’s independence (Sarah Lambrecht, Strasbourg Observers)

The draft Copenhagen Declaration – What about civil society? (Antoine Buyse, Strasbourg Observers)

The draft Copenhagen Declaration and the Court’s dual role – the need for a different definition of subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation

... more

The Court has published new factsheets on cases dealing with Religious Symbols and Clothing and Freedom of Religion. All of the Court's factsheets as well as country-specific profiles can be found on the Court's website by clicking here