Strasbourg Consortium image
Recent Publications
Research Aids
Privacy Policy
Image for <font size=4><center>The Strasbourg Consortium: Tracking the FoRB Juriprudence of the European Court of Human Rights</font></center>
Photo by Duane Madsen


PLEASE NOTE: This site has no official affiliation with the Council of Europe or the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). It is independently operated by the staff of the International Center for Law and Religion Studies at Brigham Young University Law School in the United States. 

The primary purpose of this site is to provide convenient access to information (primarily Court docments) concerning cases coming before the ECtHR relating to freedom or religion or belief (FoRB), primarily Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). These are found in this site's Case Table

For detailed information on the operations of the Court, please see the Court's website and the links below:

Image for About the Consortium
Photo by Duane Madsen

The Strasbourg Consortium was envisioned as an association of academic institutions with interest in freedom of religion or belief (FoRB), who recognized a need for an electronic forum, to encourage in-depth discussion of issues pending before the European Court of Human Rights and other international institutions.*

This need became more apparent in 2005, when the Court's Grand Chamber considered and decided the case of Leyla ┼×ahin v. Turkey, the so-called "headscarf case." This consortium of academic institutions determined that it was important to create a forum where high-level academic analysis could be made available on an expedited electronic basis to enrich the materials that the European Court of Human Rights and other international tribunals can draw on when addressing issues of freedom of religion or belief. In July of that year, the Consortium met for the first time in Strasbourg, France, to present academic analysis on the issues of freedom of religion or belief implicated by the ┼×ahin case. The resulting wealth of analysis, discussion, and recommendations were then published on the Internet.... more