Sign In | Create User Account
Strasbourg Consortium: Freedom of Conscience and Religion at the European Court of Human Rights

Strasbourg Consortium

Freedom of Conscience and Religion at the European Court of Human Rights

Home News Headlines Cases Commentary Topics Document Search Document Submit
Give Feedback

Access to Religious Community


 Cases:

  • Antochi v. Romania
  • Feldman v. Ukraine
  • Finbergs and Others v. Latvia
  • Kawiecki v. Poland
  • Kuznetsov v. Ukraine
  • Mozer v. Moldova
  • Nasakin v. Russia
  • Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine
  • X. v. Germany 2413/65

 Decision or Judgment:

  • [English] X. v. Germany - Admissibilty Decision
  • [English] Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine - Chamber Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
  • [French] Poltoratski c. Ukraine - ArrĂȘt de chambre (au principal et satisfaction Ă©quitable)
  • [English] Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine - Admissibility Decision
  • [English] Kuznetsov v. Ukraine - Chamber Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
  • [English] Kuznetsov v. Ukraine - Admissibility Decision
  •  Statement of Facts/Questions to Parties:

  • [English] Finbergs and Others v. Latvia - Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties
  • [English] Nakasin v. Russia - Statement of Facts and Questions to Parties
  • [English] Antochi v. Romania - Statement of Facts and Questions to Parties
  • [English] Kawiecki v. Poland - Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties
  • [English] Feldman v. Ukraine - Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties
  • [English] Mozer v. Moldova - Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties
  •  Court Press Release:

  • [English] Chamber judgments concerning the Ukraine 29.04.03
  •  
    Strasbourg Consortium: Freedom of Conscience and Religion at the European Court of Human Rights   -   Email Us   -   Give Feedback   -   © 2013